We are writing this summary in response to the Complaint filed by the member against GBC Floors, Kitchen and Bath. It is our position that her complaint contains several false statements of fact, as does the review that she left on our Angie’s List profile. For that reason, her complaint should be dismissed and her review should be removed from Angie’s List site. GBC entered into a contract with her or about November 23, 2015 to perform certain work in her condo located at 8340 Greensboro Drive #903, McLean, VA. The scope of work consisted of remodeling a kitchen, installing flooring, and painting the condo unit. The work was necessitated by prior water damage in the unit. She was not living in the unit at the time the work commenced, and was temporarily residing in a hotel at the expense of her insurance company. The total contract price was $20,000. She made an initial $8,000 payment per the contract upon signing. The contract provided that a second $8,000 payment was due upon the commencement of the work, and a final $4,000 payment was due upon project completion. Contrary to what is stated in her complaint, GBC was prepared to commence the work on December 5, 2015, with all materials ordered and received. The commencement of the project was delayed because the third-party mold remediation company hired by her had not completed their work in the unit as of that date. As a result, the commencement of the project was delayed until December 12, 2015. On that date, the project designer, Ms. Luisa Barry, went to the job site with two crews (one crew for the flooring, one crew for the kitchen).The mold remediation company had removed all of the carpet from the unit, and neatly wrapped all of her furniture. It should be noted that each and every allegation contained in her complaint/review regarding GBC causing damage to her furniture and property it utterly false. All furniture and property in the unit was protected at all times from construction-related damage. While GBC as a practice will protect furniture from damage during construction, it is also false that the contract required GBC to protect the furniture, as alleged by her in her review. She did not make the second $8,000 payment on December 12, 2015 and refused to do so. She admits to this in her public review. Nevertheless, GBC commenced the work despite her failure to honor the contract. It is false that GBC’s Designer and Project Manager, Florina Wojciech, threatened to put a lien on her condo if she did not make the second payment on this date. The first stage of the project involved painting (everywhere but the kitchen) and the installation of engineered wood flooring. GBC ordered and used 1050SF of flooring even though the client was only charged for 935SF. This stage of the project took 10 days to complete and was approved by the condo association. Meanwhile, GBC commenced the second stage of the project – the kitchen remodel. She did not make the second $8,000 payment until December 22, 2015, when this first stage of the project was completed and the second stage was well underway. The kitchen remodel involved the installation of new cabinets, granite countertops, a sink, a disposal, and drywall. She selected the cabinets during a session with Ms. Barry at the GBC showroom in Alexandria, VA. The kitchen remodel was completed on December 24, 2015. At the time of completion, she was still temporarily residing at a hotel. She moved back into the condo unit some time prior to December 30, 2015. At her request, GBC agreed to help her unpack her furniture (which was still packaged/wrapped in the condition in which the mold remediation company left it), and to arrange the furniture per her instructions. GBC agreed to do so, under her supervision, even though this was not part of the contract. At this stage, she had not made any complaints about the quality of the work. The husbands only complaint was that Ms. Barry responded slowly to e-mails. However, when GBC asked for the final $4,000 payment, she began a series of demands relating to the work. She asked for the paint to be touched up in certain areas, she asked for certain planks of the flooring to replaced due to natural markings, and she asked for certain molding to be replaced. Although GBC disputed that the work was necessary, GBC agreed to do so and scheduled the work for January 9, 2016. On that date, Ms. Barry and two crews arrived at the unit to perform the work, and found markings all over the walls (which were not previously present). The crews performed the repairs, at which time an honest mistake was made with the paint (the wrong texture paint was used for touch-up work). That same day, Ms. Wojciechvisited the unit to supervise the crews and the work. She complained to her that GBC did sloppy work, and her daughter complained that the GBCcrew members did not speak English and did not understand her. It became clear to Ms. Wojciech at that time she was demanding GBC to repair work that was not in need of repair following the completion of the installation on 12/24/15.However, Ms. Wojciech attempted to satisfy her by instructing the GBC crew to perform the touch-up work she requested. It is absolutely false that Ms. Wojciechacted in an aggressive or hostile manner towards her or her daughter, or engaged in any name-calling, shouting or threats as alleged. There were many witnesses present in the unit on that date who will verify this fact. When the work was complete, Ms. Parvizi verified that everything looked okay, and the crews left. Rather than sending in the final payment as Ms. Wojciech expected, she sent e-mails to GBC with complaints about the work. She demanded that GBC go back to the unit to fix additional items. On January 18, 2016, Ms. Wojciech and two crews went back to the home, again, to satisfy her and to do additional touch up work. Again, Ms. Wojciech asked the crews to perform the work requested by her, and crews proceeded to do so. Ms. Wojciech even agreed that GBC would replace a cabinet door that had some dirt on it. Again, rather than sending in the final payment as Ms. Wojciech expected, she sent more e-mails to GBC complaining about the quality of the cabinets that she had selected. She demanded to communicate only with the owner of GBC, Mr. Serkan Keskin. Mr. Keskin visited the unit with Cesar Nerio, the GBC foreman, to address her concerns. The parties agreed that GBC would refinish the cabinet doors (even though there was nothing wrong with them), repaint the unit using a master painter, and replace some additional floor pieces. When this work was completed, she delivered a $2,000 check to GBC (which represented only half of the remaining balance).She subsequently stopped payment on the check. She then posted the Angie’s List review and filed a complaint.