The member contacted our office on March 7, 20011, and requested an estimate for roof repairs. She did not request to be called prior to inspection. When potential customers make this request, we attempt to honor it to the best of our ability. The inspection was performed March 9, 2011, at approximately 10:00 to 10:30 a.m. This was approximately 48 HOURS from receiving the member's request. The roof was sufficiently inspected and deemed repairable, as opposed to requiring full replacement. A proposal was mailed out THE FOLLOWING DAY, March 10, 2011. I believe the 'one to two week' period the member may be thinking of is the period between March 10, 2011, and when we received her returned, signed contract dated March 22, 2011, (twelve days from the date of proposal). The work was then placed on our schedule the very next day. Since the St. Louis area received light snow on March 24, March 25, and heavy snow on March 26, repairs were not performed during this time. There was no snow on March 27, but since it was a Sunday, no repairs were performed on this day. We again received light snow on March 28, March 29, and a mixture of snow/rain on March 30. On March 31, rain was predicted, and plans made based on that prediction, but we received no precipitation. On April 1, 2011, Rick Willis, our superintendent, called the member at approximately 7:30 a.m., (leaving a message on her voice mail), to inform her that we were planning on doing the repairs that day. Two of our repairmen then arrived at her home to perform the repairs. Regarding the 'confusion', the work card did mention 'general maintenance repairs' along with specific instructions for other repairs. Each repaiman had more time involved in the job than what the member witnessed. Many homeowners are also not aware of overhead costs for roofing companies. For example, workers compensation rates for roofers are $26.86 per every $100 paid in wages. This is in addition to FICA taxes, state unemployment contributions, federal unemployment contributions, general liability costs, truck costs, gasoline, equipment, medical insurance, retirement package contributions, OSHA safety requirements, etc. We do encourage homeowners to obtain proposals from other reputable contractors so they can see price comparisons. If the member had done this during the approximately 9-day period before she returned her signed contract, she could have seen that our company does not charge exorbitant amounts, and that any reputable roofing contractor with hourly employees has the same overhead costs. However, we are willing to refund the memberthe amount of $250.00 for any inconvenience she feels she encountered through our company, and will be mailing payment to her today. We also hope she will reconsider the grade of 'F' for professionalism (since we performed her repair in a very professional manner), the grade of 'F' for punctuality (since we performed the repair as soon as mother nature allowed), the grade of 'F for responsiveness (since we inspected the roof 48 hours from the time of her initial call), the grade of 'C' for quality (since she stated in her phone conversation with me that we had indeed completely stopped the leaks), and grade of 'F' for price (since she may now have a better understanding of true costs), and particularly the overall grade of 'F', which is clearly undeserved.