Custom homes built on owner's land. Home owners to secure financing through their lender of choice if indicated.
Business highlights
40 years of trusted experience
Services we offer
Residential general contractor providing design-build services in the Puget Sound area of Washington and Kittitas County. Extensive experience in architectural design, construction, and additions; styles include Northwest, hideaway retreats, Tuscan, Cape Cod, and modern. Homes are developed based on lot and home owners' preferences, ranging from 1,500 to 10,000 square feet.
"Caveat Emptor" - Let the buyer beware. THIS CONTRACTOR IS NOT WILLING TO MEET TO RESOLVE ISSUES. HE HAS RESORTED TO THE UNETHICAL TACTIC OF ATTEMPTING TO DRIVE A PERSONAL WEDGE BETWEEN MY WIFE AND ME, PARTNERS WITH WHOM HE HAS CONTRACTED. Terhune Homes, Inc is a residential building contractor in Kent, Washington. In March, 2013 my wife and I contracted with Terhune to build a new home in Bonney Lake, Washington. Terhune publishes a Homeowner's Orientation Manual which covers what to expect "before, during and after construction". In it, Terhune invites any questions about "progress or procedures while your home is under construction". We received this manual over EIGHT MONTHS after signing our contract, at our final "walk-through," which, according to contract, occurs "upon substantial completion of the Project". In the manual Terhune provides a "change" form, the purpose of which is to ensure that both parties understand all aspects of a change to the contracted agreements and how it affects the cost. It provides space for a detailed description of the change, for a clear statement of the additional charge required for the change and for formal approval by the parties by their signatures. Although we needed to order several changes, Terhune did not present us with ANY of these required forms. The results of this glaring omission are that he implemented and billed us for changes which we had not properly reviewed and approved. Terhune ended up giving us unsatisfactory work. We were not given the opportunity to clarify or rectify proposed changes BEFORE they were actually constructed. We have ten major outstanding issues. 1. Terhune built our fireplace according to his own tastes and without proper review and approval. I had offered photos of my preferred concept for a design; my wife offered her own (in some respects conflicting) ideas. Terhune should have insisted we all should have sat down to sketch out an agreed concept. 2. Terhune misaligned the pendant lights above our kitchen island. This glaring error resulted from his failure to coordinate the project per contract. One subcontractor located light fixtures while another located and installed the island. Terhune refused to fix the problem, arguing that we had verbally specified the exact location of the lights out of alignment with the island - a patently ridiculous claim. 3. Terhune refused to review with us an updated electrical plan after we had requested changes at a walk-through with the electrician. Now we have no documentation of our electrical "as-built" design to present to future electrical contractors. 4. Terhune failed to level our front yard despite having done excavating billed at over $4,800. We have requested a conference to review this subject, but Terhune has refused. 5. Terhune's work on our master-bath sink backsplash tiles and shower tiles is unsatisfactory. We have requested an on-site review of the tile installation, but Terhune has refused. 6. Terhune misaligned the master-bath vanity lights with the countertop and faucets. 7. Terhune failed to insure proper roof drainage into the gutter system. 8. There is a crack in the hardwood flooring in front of the fireplace. 9. There is a material defect in the garage/utility-room door adjacent to the deadbolt lock. 10. Exterior paint was not properly bonded to caulking and has washed away. Terhune failed to coordinate plans for work of its subcontractors and suppliers. This is an obvious error in management and defect in workmanship. We contend that rework is appropriate and the responsibility of Terhune.
Description of Work: Terhune built our custom home on Lake Tapps, near Bonney Lake, WA..
Rating Category
Rating out of 5
quality
3.0
value
3.0
professionalism
2.0
responsiveness
1.0
punctuality
3.0
$287,000
Response from TERHUNE HOMES INC
Terhune Homes, Inc. (THI) has reviewed [member name removed] complaint (s) provided to Angie’s List. The complaint was emailed from [member name removed], although [member name removed] is noted as the signature. [member name removed] provided the same complaint (s) to the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and the Washington State Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division in December 2013. At his request/filing of the complaints, THI responded in great detail and depth reviewing the entirety of the building project with great emphasis placed on specific items he outlines. Documentation and correspondence history was further supported in the numerous attachments provided with the response to these two agencies. As response space is limited, THI’s position to each item can be reviewed and/or copied off the Washington State BBB’s website and/or through Washington State Public Records File #440339. Both agencies responded to [member name removed] and provided THI’s extensive documentation. After review of THI’s response, the Attorney General’s office stated, “This consumer complaint has been closed accordingly.” with no further action indicated for THI. The “BBB found business made a good faith effort to resolve complaint but customer not satisfied with business response. “ Further noting, “Complaint Resolution: BBB determined that despite the company’s reasonable effort to address complaint issues, the consumer remained dissatisfied.” THI continues to have an “A+” rating with the BBB. The below excerpts are taken directly from THI’s December 24, 2013, response to the Attorney General and provide a limited summation for the overall project: “The [member name removed] chose to contract with THI to build a custom home; Custom Construction Agreement (“contract”) for this project was acknowledged by [member name removed], and Bryan C. Terhune, a representative of THI on March 19, 2013, and included the Bid Estimate and Specifications (refer to Attachment I). Of note, in [member name removed] COMPLAINT SUMMARY provided to your office, when he was questioned, “Did you sign a contract?” his reply was “No”. The primary contact during the scope of the building was [member name removed]. The build process went very well with the home being completed months ahead of schedule; as per the contract, THI had 240 days from the time footings were signed off (6/27/13) plus an additional 14 working days for extending past December 20, 2013 (refer to Attachment I, Contract Section 3, paragraph 4). On November 16, 2013 THI received an email from [member name removed] indicating, “[member name removed] will be the spokesman regarding the house from this point forward.” Following this multitude of emails came from [member name removed] in which responses, clarification, and supporting documentation have been provided in great detail when indicated. November 29, 2013, THI was notified by [member name removed] he posted a review to YELP. November 30, 2013, THI was notified by [member name removed] he submitted a complaint to the Washington State Attorney General. December 3, 2013 [member name removed] informed THI he submitted a complaint to the BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU (BBB); approximately the same time frame [member name removed] proceeded to post to subcontractor, supplier, I Love Lake Tapps, BBB, and Master Builder Association facebook / webpages regarding the YELP review. Despite [member name removed] allegations, THI continued to respond to [member name removed] number emails, correspond with the City of Bonney Lake in order to expedite the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (Attachment II), complete the punchlist created at the time of mutual walk through on November 21, 2013, (reviewed in detail refer to Attachment III, email dated December 4, 2013), as well as many additional items [member name removed] listed following the November 21, 2013 walk through, all addressed as a courtesy. Further, THI has continued working with the [member name removed] lender, BECU, despite not receiving final draw funds in full at the time requested which late fees would be applicable for yet THI has delayed this as a good faith measure to close the project out in its entirety. In addition, THI extended payments to subcontractors and suppliers to insure processing would be expedited and easily processed despite owner delays in payment to THI. THI, at the time of final building inspection (December 3, 2013) by the City of Booney Lake Inspector, was informed an approach would be required to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. [member name removed] was immediately informed of this and provided a quote the next day for this score of work which lied outside of the contract and was unforeseen. He informed THI we were not approved to perform this scope of work and he was going to “research…other prospective contractors.” He actually attempted to try to contract with our subcontractor unbeknownst to us direct (refer to Attachment IV series of emails for Right-of-Way Approach). The outcome of this was entirely unproductive and caused unnecessary delays, as THI could have had the approach completed and a Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) by Friday, December 6, 2013, instead the C of O was not completed until December 16, 2013. Despite [member name removed] actions, and lack of notification to THI he hired another contractor and scheduled the final (which THI had offered to do). THI assisted the City with additional paperwork on the 16th to insure a quicker completion. THI continued to assist in the goal of obtaining the C of O so the [member name removed] could occupy their home. In the many facebook postings [member name removed] chose to post to various sites, “We had hoped to be in by Christmas, but we are currently embroiled in a dispute with our builder, Terhune Homes.” As mentioned previously, THI completed the home months ahead of schedule owner chose to delay completing the approach, and they are occupying their home. No notification to THI was provided regarding moving in, nor has final payments been received from the [member name removed]. As per the contract (refer to Attachment I), Section 10. Completion and Punchlist. The project “deemed completed.” Further, as per Section 10.1. paragraph 2, “Owner shall not occupy nor place possessions in or about the Project until the Project is considered complete in according with the foregoing, Contractor has been paid in full, including for any changes or additional, and Owner has otherwise accepted the Project in all respects. Should Owner take possession of the Project before any of the foregoing events occurs, Owner shall be conclusively deemed to have waived any claim for correction, modification or completion of any component of the Project, including but not limited to any Punchlist item, and all amounts hereunder shall be immediately due and payable.” Despite learning the [member name removed] have taken possession of the home, THI has continued to act in good faith in the best interest of the [member name removed] by providing the requested heat pump manual, and the correct screen size for one of their doors yesterday. Further, the old screens were removed, and the door screens were installed yesterday as a courtesy to the owners with them present and requesting this even though they indicated they would do all of the screen installation. Homeowners Orientation Manual / Change Order Process: The [member name removed] have been aware of the Change Order process from the time of signing of the contract on March 19, 2013. Change orders are clearly outlined in the Construction Agreement, section 7. (a). (refer to Attachment I). There was never any “omission” of the Change Order process. In addition, the orientation manual is provided to clients as a courtesy, and is not a contract document. [member name removed] utilizes email a great deal for correspondence as does THI, versus telephone and facsimiles. This assists in expediting response time and approvals. Email approvals for changed, deletions, upgrades, and general comments are acceptable forms of documentation. The “Additional Work Authorization” if not the sole avenue for this type of correspondence, not to mention in order to use this document one must be near a scanner and / or facsimile to provide and return a response which can cause delays. The electronic format is vast replacing the hard copy format as we are all aware of. “THI proposed to [member name removed] on December 11, 2013, that any future dealings regarding the home project be with her; however, she did not agree to this and she indicated [member name removed] would not allow for this. THI informed her multiple times in a good faith effort for her personally that we have been requested to respond to the BBB and the Washington State Attorney General and our response would be public record. THI has reviewed matters with professionals and has been put in the position of having to defend a very clear position which has left us facing extenuating circumstances beyond our control as outlined in Attachment VIII, the email history between THI and [member name removed] solely from December 7 through 18, 2013. [member name removed] has been very clear in her emails that THI has provided the [member name removed] with a fabulous home”. She has been very apologetic for the actions her husband has taken as a course of action against THI based upon his condition, and in some respects wishes she could take [member name removed] actions back however this is not a possibility due to actions that might ensue against her by him. Because of the information provided THI has had to address safety concerns not only for our staff, but for our subcontractors and suppliers. THI has made every effort to bring resolution and closure to this project. Clearly the [member name removed] have brought closure to this project by taking possession of the home, and waiving any claim for correction of remaining items. THI has completed its scope of work on the [member name removed] home. The Certificate of Occupancy has been received. Final inspections have been completed both by the lender and the City. The [member name removed] have taken possession of the home. There are no remaining issues THI is responsible for based upon the above information provided.”
Still browsing? Check out these Angi Certified Pros
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our State Contractor License Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.
Service Categories
Homebuilders,
Architects,
General Remodeling
FAQ
TERHUNE HOMES INC is currently rated 3.5 overall out of 5.
Monday: 9:30 AM - 3:00 PM
Tuesday: 9:30 AM - 3:00 PM
Wednesday: 9:30 AM - 3:00 PM
Thursday: 9:30 AM - 3:00 PM
TERHUNE HOMES INC accepts the following forms of payment: Check
Yes, TERHUNE HOMES INC offers free project estimates.
Yes, TERHUNE HOMES INC offers eco-friendly accreditations.
No, TERHUNE HOMES INC does not offer a senior discount.
No, TERHUNE HOMES INC does not offer emergency services.
Yes, TERHUNE HOMES INC offers warranties.
TERHUNE HOMES INC offers the following services: Residential general contractor providing design-build services in the Puget Sound area of Washington and Kittitas County. Extensive experience in architectural design, construction, and additions; styles include Northwest, hideaway retreats, Tuscan, Cape Cod, and modern. Homes are developed based on lot and home owners' preferences, ranging from 1,500 to 10,000 square feet.
Financing.
Contact information
P.O. Box 1267 Office: 812 Central Ave. N., Kent, WA 98032, Kent, WA 98035