The house fire occurred on November 29, 2013. Shon arrived to our house while the firefighters were still there. We never asked him to come to our house, which in hindsight probably should have been a red flag. Shon proceed to talk us into meeting with him the next day about rebuilding the home. We met with Shon. He seemed focused on making sure we signed a document that day, 11/30/13. Everything is urgent with Shon. He said we need to move quick so he could secure the property and prevent vandals from taking the undamaged possessions from the home. I, as my mother’s power of attorney, asked Shon if signing the document locked us in to using him. Shon is really good at never giving a direct answer. Instead he gave a long answer than ended by inferring that at some point singing the document would lock us in. The document said he would do the work and Shon would work with our insurance company. We later discovered there was small print at the bottom of the document that says if we ever bring Shon to court we would pay his legal fees. We had the option to have a public adjuster to appraise the value of the property and content loss due to the fire, or we could just accept the appraised value by our insurance company. Shon told us if we go to our insurance company without someone to explain values, our insurance company will short us funds we deserve. We therefore trusted Shon and opted to use a public adjuster. We later found out that by using this adjuster all payments made to Shon had to go through this adjuster, who also required a fee. Shon didn’t tell us that this adjuster also gets 10% of whatever we pay Shon. When I found this out from my insurance company I was very upset and called Shon about this. Shon again talked real fast and tried to make it seem all ok, so I trusted him. By that time, our 72 hour window had past and we were locked into a contract with Shon. Our insurance company paid Shon roughly $50,000 to start work on the home, with the expectation of another $30,000 once the work was completed. We personally paid Shon an additional $15,000 as well. Therefore Shon has roughly received $65,000. Shon said, at the very latest, our home would be done at the end of February 2014. It is now August 2014. Shon has not taken our phone calls and responded to numerous texts and voice messages. Hardly any work has been done to the home. It is still not livable. Looking back, Shon made it seem like he can make anythinghappen, he answered all our phone calls, gave us deadline after deadline, excuse after excuse, and has never delivered. When we hired Shon his company name was Block To Block Restoration but it may have now changed to something like Express Fire Restoration. Overall, we don’t want to see anyone else to have to go through a similar situation.
Description of Work: Shon Dennis, whose legal name probably is Edrick Dennis, was to rebuild my 89 year old mother’s home after a house fire. Shon is the owner of Block To Block Restoration.
Rating Category
Rating out of 5
quality
1.0
value
1.0
professionalism
1.0
responsiveness
1.0
punctuality
1.0
$100,000
Response from Block Two Block Restoration
Block to Block Restoration, LLC (the “Company”) respectfully takes this opportunity to address multiple false and/or exaggerated statements made against it in the filed complaint on August 22, 2014. The Company learned of the fire at [member name removed] home at [member address removed] (the “Property”) from information obtained thru public information posted on the Houston Fire Department’s website and not by a “police scanner” as alleged. The Company’s representative, Mr. Dennis visited [member name removed] on 11/30/13 and discussed what actions may be taken to restore the Property and in dealing with her insurance company, Farmers Insurance. The person who file this complaint was [member name removed], the daughter of [member name removed] who had signed the contract. it had been [member name removed] idea that Mr. Dennis meet with the family at a later date to explain the services, which I accommodated such request. The Company’s contract with [member name removed] outlined, and it was explained to the family, that the Company would perform the scope of work approved by Farmers and that the reimbursement therein is based upon fair market pricing. It was explained that a Public Adjuster could be used to help maximize the scope of work that Farmers would ultimately approve. Further, that that the cost of the public adjuster would come out of the Company’s funds, NOT funds to [member name removed] (e.g. no additional cost). [member name removed] and the family indicated that they understood and were in agreement. Mr. Dennis provided the contact information for a known public adjuster; indicated that they must contract with the public adjuster separately; and that they were not required to use the (or any) public adjuster. [member name removed] and/or [member name removed] contracted separately with the Public Adjuster. The Company disputes the allegation that work was “overcharged.” The pricing for the damage was based on the Property’s zip code and estimating software. Both Farmers and the Public Adjuster came to an agreement as to the costs of recovery and [member name removed] agreed to the same, in writing, and did not rescind her decision within the required 3-day period. To the Company’s knowledge, Farmers has pad for [member name removed] rent from the day of the fire until at least August 2014; therefore, it disputes that she has been paying rent or “thousands of dollars of living expenses” outside of her insurance agreement. Further, in light of certain delays outside of its control, the Company has voluntarily provided $2,400.00 from its contract to [member name removed] over a 2-month period. The Company disputes the claim that he Property went 2 months “without being worked on.” There had been delays due to permitting, building plans and flood certification required by the COH and which the review and approval where were outside of the Company’s control. Diligent efforts were undertaken to obtain permits and supply information to move forward. The Company was prohibited from moving forward at various stages without inspection and permits being completely correct and/or approved. [member name removed] and/or [member name removed] were informed of this every step of the way. Further, [member name removed] sister changed her mind regarding the paint color in late August and the Company voluntarily repainted, at no extra charge, in early September. As of September 15, 2014, work on the Property continues. To date, there has been approximately $50,000 in repairs done to the Property. There has been no allegation or direction by [member name removed] and/or [member name removed] that the Company has or will be terminated and they continue to have work performed on the Property. It is more than 85% complete and expected to be finished within the next 2 weeks, based on final approval from the COH. Thereafter, work may commence on an extra room and garage that were requested and contracted for outside the scope of the insurance proceeds paid by Farmers. The cost for the additional work was $15,000.00. As such, the Company disputes the representation that the approximate cost for the contracted work is around $100,000.00. Mr. Dennis has met with [member name removed], [member name removed], and their family on at least 2 occasions and have spoken with them on the phone whenever requested or otherwise to keep them apprised of the work and any issues regarding the Property. [member name removed] has contacted Mr. Dennis on several occasions and spoken in a very heated and uncordial manner. The family has been by the Property and seen the work is ongoing and, respectfully, now that the work is nearing completion, seeks a “refund” of all work. Such requested demand is not equitable. [member name removed] has made the allegation that the Company is somehow changed its name or that Mr. Dennis is operating another company in its place. Such statement is defamatory. At all times, Block to Block Restoration has performed that work and there is no other company performing work on the Property for which Mr. Dennis is involved.
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our State Contractor License Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.
Service Categories
General Remodeling,
Water & Smoke Damage
FAQ
Block Two Block Restoration is currently rated 1 overall out of 5.
No, Block Two Block Restoration does not offer free project estimates.
No, Block Two Block Restoration does not offer eco-friendly accreditations.
No, Block Two Block Restoration does not offer a senior discount.
No, Block Two Block Restoration does not offer emergency services.
No, Block Two Block Restoration does not offer warranties.