The negative Angie’s list report filed by the homeowner is misleading to Angie’s List readers and the details presented contained less than accurate statements, particularly her omissions of key facts that impacted the project completion date. Define the project: remodeling a 2nd floor Master Bath in an 87 year old home. Scope of work: remove all wall tiles, floor tile, shower walls, & plaster walls to studs. Provide all electric services, provide all plumbing services, disconnect hot water heat, re-paint radiator, furnish moisture resistant board in shower, re-dry wall the entire room including arched custom ceiling, re-build new walk in shower, add vent to exterior, provide lighting, provide custom storage cabinetry and new vanity, install Cambria quartz counters, sills, ledges, supply all new fixtures and fittings (14 items) to include new tub, faucets, spouts, shower fittings, drains, supplies, new shut off valves, bath accessories and mirror. Exception: re-use owner’s old toilet. Prime coat and finish paint room. Provide new custom leak proof rubber floor membrane in shower. Furnish & install new heated floor. Install owner supplied tile for all walls & shower walls (74 sq. ft.) and shower floor (12 sq. ft.) and main floor (49 sq. ft.). Provide new Rex Glass thick shower door and glass walls. House location: poor or limited access- limited street size, no parking available, house on a hill. Difficulty of project from 1 to 10 being highest: This job was a 10 Reasons for difficulty: We planned for the tile removal to be a big part of the project. The existing wall and floor tile was discovered to be buried in 5 to 6” solid cement throughout the entire room. This is unusual for homes in her area and an unforeseen element of the project. The only possible way for it to be removed was through the use of a jack hammer. To make matters worse there was no place for a dumpster, no parking on the street. The drive way was limited because of it being so narrow and the customer demanded access throughout the work day. Jack hammering of all ceramic walls and floor tiles was required versus hand demolition (she was not charged for this extra labor costs). Hand removal of the extra concrete debris was required and workers hand carried approximately 30,000 lbs of concrete from the 2nd floor bath through the master bedroom, down a 30’ hall, down a 40’ staircase, over a 30’ hall onto a porch, down steps, over a walk way and into a small pick up truck. Each carried load by our laborers was an approximately 60 to 90 pounds. Given the severity of the demolition and the dust it created within the work area, the dust in perimeter areas was very well controlled. The weather created problems; the worst weather Pittsburgh had experienced in 100 years was February & March of 2015. Subzero temperatures and blizzard conditions were the norm and the homeowner demanded all cutting type work required to be completed outside. (Serving as yet another homeowner demand that impacted the completion date) The customer created obstacles: The homeowners would not allow us to store materials in their home (adding to daily time delays) and she interfered in our efforts to obtain electrical or plumbing permits. Five days prior to the start of work, the homeowner advised us that she didn’t want any inspectors in her home because she feared they might discover issues that would lead to cost overruns. The contractor advised the homeowner of additional work and specifics of the job progress every week because she was at working at home. The last three weeks of the project the home owners requested daily updates of progress and any issues impacting construction. The customer was totally unappreciative of anything we accomplished and was constantly critical of the tradesmen and was matter of fact about the quality of the work, which given the working conditions and homeowners restrictions was both good in quality and of a positive attitude. The homeowner alluded to the payment schedule, which was outlined in the signed sales agreement, and she wanted to change the payment terms in the middle of the project. Sales Agreement payment terms were not met because the homeowner was late in scheduled payments, deliberately delaying completion through altered access to the job including adding a vacation during the project and other delays due to her insistence in rearranging scheduled service calls and limiting hours of access during the normal work days. What was the date that the actual work started: Jan 28, 2015 What was the completion date: Mar 17, 2015 Estimated time to remodel promised: No promises were ever made (promises are not included in our company policies & procedures). We estimated the work to take approximately 4 to 6 weeks per our written, customer approved, Sales Agreement. How many missed work days was there during this entire process: work was started Jan 28 and work continued for over five weeks without missing one day of work. During the fifth week the contractor was out one day due to sickness. Work resumed the following day until completion. What items that were ordered were untimely, late or back ordered? Not one. What items were ordered incorrectly or had to be re-ordered. Not one. What items had to be remade or replaced. Not one. How many Change Orders did you back charge the customer? Not one. List the extra work done that was not charged to the customer: • We had to replace all of the wood floor joists in the entire room with new 2x10’s due to the faulty installation of the 5 to 6” thick cement that was pored over them. The existing joists were chiseled and tapered almost to a point to allow for the cement to float to the top. This fancy old style home-made maneuver made it impossible to lay a new sub floor over thus requiring new joists. Cost to owner $0.0 • All the pipes were totally replaced in the floor and walls due to corrosion. Cost to owner $0.0 • We furnished and installed a new high quality toilet and toilet seat rather than re-using the old toilet. Cost to owner $0.0 • The plumbing leak damage: jack hammering the cement loosened the old pipes in the cement floor. Looking at it you could not detect a leak. The 87 year old shut off valves did not hold the water pressure in the lines and this caused a water leak. The contractor was dispatched and quickly arrived to investigate and remedy the problem. The solution was to replace the faulty valves. The water damage areas were re-painted. We did not pass blame or suggest that this was the owners responsibility even though all we did was turn off the valves. Conversely, the home owner accused us of working with the valves in the on position. If this were the case the water would have been gushing from all supply lines. We took care of the mishaps. Cost to owner $0.0 • The homeowner did not acknowledge these no charge services, not even with a simple thank you… How much time did the actual job take? 7 weeks How much time did the customer say the actual job took? 10 weeks? The homeowner said “after 4 weeks she was billed 100% of the job”? This statement is completely false and she is misleading your readers in making that claim. Why did the customer demand that North Shore Kitchens change the payment terms of the Sales Agreement? The terms of their sales agreement were 30% due with the order, 30% due on delivery of materials, and 30% due on start of installation of tile and 10% due on completion. They decided to withhold was the 30% due on start of installation of the tile (product that they provided). They said this request was for our final payment which is not true. The terms were fair, and the reasoning behind the terms that once the room would be ready to receive tile that the vast majority of the project labor would be complete, which included; all demolition, all plumbing, all electric, all drywall, venting, and painting. These were the original terms the customer agreed to when they signed and placed a deposit to schedule the onset of work. There was no reason to modify the terms or payment schedule as nothing had changed from when we started to where we were in work progress of the project. What could have the homeowner do to make the work go more smoothly? Actually there were several things they could have done. They could have been more courteous and appreciative to those who were working in their home. Recognizing the workmen’s efforts to respect the homeowners’ requests for access throughout the work area, even if it oftentimes interfered in their ability to work efficiently always help reduce stress of a remodeling project for all involved. Additionally the home had extra bedrooms that were not being used (one even having a working bath). They could have stayed there during the construction instead of sleeping within construction area, which would have helped minimize her allergy issues. The odor of the 87 year old cement and debris was difficult and nasty to work with and there was no reason for the homeowners to insist that they continue to sleep with the mess and smell of construction materials. Additionally, offering easier access to materials and tools on the job would have help speed up the project, versus the mandating the “tent” room set up in the work area, which greatly hampered progress. The comments about being unprofessional. I simply told the homeowner that the payment terms would remain as originally accepted and being persistent on collecting late payments. She may have perceived that as negative or unprofessional, but it is simply holding her responsible for upholding her side of the sales agreement. The bath remodel was more difficult than we anticipated and FAR more so than she anticipated. Her displeasure with a difficult remodeling project is understandable but placing blame on my company for issues that she helped to create and using the Angie’s List platform to make false statements to condemn my company is not just unreasonable, it is completely irresponsible. From our original measuring accuracy, our planning services, designing, detailed pricing, specific contracting details, accurate ordering, perfect scheduling, and providing expert installation services, my professional opinion is the customer received an A+ job from North Shore Kitchens in all respects . If my being direct about not being paid in a timely manner (per the contract) or if the homeowner continues not pay the bill, for the myriad of excuses they offered, makes me unprofessional, then I suppose she can claim “I’m no longer professional”. Conclusion: (removed member name) did an adequate job of misrepresenting me, my company, and my subcontractors and his employees with her “F” grades. Her militant approach to the project and condescending manner were certainly an obstacle to deal with but in spite of these obstacles, we provided quality work, at a reasonable price and completed the project. I will point out that there were multiple occasions where my laborers requested that I relieve them of their work responsibilities on her job because of the endless badgering, complaining, and negative disposition. Her final email to me speaks for itself. “The ability to salvage our relationship does not exist”! The Angies’ List rating system leaves the homeowner with the upper hand and in this case, unfairly so... When I was a very young man my father once said “for every bad contractor there are 100 bad customers.” In THIS case we just experienced one of the 100. Jim English President North Shore Kitchen Design Center 1501 Preble Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15233