Response to [removed member name] Review Dated 10/21/13 Please refer to the photo gallery in reference to the below response: Existing Condition Facts: Epic Construction mobilized the project on 1/7/13 as a sub-contractor directed by Lowes. Epic’s sub-contract amount $17,608.17, not the $34,000.00 stated in [removed member name] review. Epic’s sub-contract amount included a change order in the amount of $3,780.00 for additional demolition, wall framing, electrical demolition, and a new electrical sub-panel designated for the newly remodeled space. Lowe’s provided all cabinetry, flooring, appliances, paint, and 80% of the building material. [removed member name] home was constructed in early 1900’s. When Epic arrived onsite and established benchmarks, we discovered that the existing floor in [removed member name] home was out of level by more than 3 inches in 15 feet and the existing ceiling was approximately one inch out of level. Demolition & Progress Construction: Upon commencing the demolition, Epic became aware of many unforeseen conditions, including faulty electrical wiring; open neutrals ; marred branch circuits; knob & tube wiring; exposed junction boxes; false ceilings; window infill framing; log chinking and numerous other issues relating to the age of [removed member name] home and previous remodeling performed by others. As Epic exposed these underlying conditions, we photographed and documented them, reviewed the conditions thoroughly with home-owner and also with Lowes Project Manager. Costs and options were presented by Epic and reviewed and approved and/or disapproved by the homeowner and Lowes. The homeowner and Lowes elected to let the false ceiling remain, which was currently framed at 8 feet above the finished floor. Given this direction from the homeowner and Lowes, Epic proceeded with demolition, which included the removal of unnecessary electrical branch circuits (approx. 40 linear feet). Contrary to [removed member name] allegations, Epic had a business need to conduct this work. Epic also installed new partition stud walls, electrical sub-panel designated for the newly renovated space, branch wiring, fiberglass batt insulation, and 2 inch DOW Foam insulation in the wall cavities. Additionally, Epic installed ½ inch drywall with level “4” finish, primer and (2) coats of finish paint on all walls & ceilings (which is customary in residential construction). Notably, Lowes requires their General Contractors (such as Epic) to obtain homeowner sign-offs and approvals throughout all phases of remodeling prior to submitting invoices for payment. Also, all progress work is reviewed thoroughly and approved by the homeowner. In the event that excess building material supplied by Lowes is not utilized, the homeowner elects whether to retain or return the material. As the homeowner, [removed member name] reviewed and approved all phases of Epic’s work – and did not set forth any complaints until the completion of the project when final payment was due. In fact, [removed member name] expressed nothing but pleasure and satisfaction with Epic’s work throughout construction. Flooring: The homeowner chose 5/16 inch Armstrong hardwood flooring, without any input from Epic. When the flooring arrived on site, Epic reviewed the flooring specifications and advised the homeowner that moisture tests on the existing substrate revealed that the chosen material was non-compliant per manufactures specification. Epic advised [removed member name] that it would best to select alternate flooring to better suit the substrate, moisture test result and existing conditions in [removed member name] home. [removed member name] had already purchased and specially ordered the flooring from Lowes and, therefore, decided to proceed with the flooring she had previously selected. Against Epic’s advice, [removed member name] directed us to proceed with the flooring installation and Epic installed the floor (1x). Bullet Points Regarding [removed member name] Allegations: • [removed member name] stated that Epic installed the flooring installed four times. The truth is that Epic installed the flooring once, but was installed in an area against manufactures recommendations. Epic informed [removed member name] of potential issues; however, she made the decision to proceed with the flooring she had previously selected. • [removed member name] alleges that Epic installed the kitchen island to close to the counters. Epic installed the island at 42.5 inches per the drawings provided by Lowes and reviewed by [removed member name]. • [removed member name] states that Epic incorrectly placed a light in her dining room. Epic conducted an electrical rough-in walk through with [removed member name] prior to electrical box and wire placements. (See Attached Sketch provided by customer/Lowes). [removed member name] directed Epic as to the final placement of lighting and switch devices. • [removed member name] alleges that Epic painted over light bulbs. Epic installs temporary bulbs throughout construction phases and installs new bulbs d prior to the final turnover. This is a standard practice in the construction industry. • [removed member name] takes issue with the quality of painting done at her residence. As demonstrated in the attached progress photos, Epic completed painting prior to flooring or cabinet installation. Again, this is typical in construction. Epic completed all touch-up work necessary prior to completion of the project. • [removed member name] also alleges that Epic performed faulty trim work. Epic installed base moldings, window & door casings per industry standard. As typical in construction, especially in a home constructed in the early 1900’s, 1/32 inch to 1/16 inch gaps occurred in certain areas where moldings met dissimilar building materials. When applicably, Epic caulked all gaps with Acrylic Painters caulk to seamlessly meet the drywall, and finish painted. • [removed member name] claims that electrical wiring was stolen and that Epic had no business performing work in her electrical panel. As explained above, Epic installed a new subpanel. Moreover, Epic was responsible for the removal and disposal of all leftover material from the job site. Epic did not improperly remove any materials from [removed member name]home. Summary: As demonstrated by the attached progress photos, a reasonable person would be impressed with Epic’s work. In fact, [removed member name] continuously expressed her satisfaction and gratitude to Epic throughout this project. It was not until the time of payment that Ms. Faust became dissatisfied. Of course, it is unfortunate to read this type of review of Epic’s work. Epic takes pride in its integrity, customer service and craftsmanship. As always, Epic went over and beyond its contractual obligations in the work performed on [removed member name] home. Unfortunately, in this case, it became obvious that regardless of how much work and re-work that Epic completed for [removed member name], [removed member name] would never be satisfied.