We take customer service extremely seriously, confirmed by the fact we received Angie's List “Super Service Award” every year we have been in business (more than 80% of our 91 reviews are “A's”). Our written contract contains only two items: (1) install a cap at cost, and (2) tuck point the entire chimney, which involves removing bad mortar between the bricks with a grinder, replacing it with new mortar. (Below we attach copy of the contract). We installed a cap, and did an excellent tuck-point that was paid for it in full, and right away. The quality of our work is not in dispute, only its clean-up. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT AND OUR RESPONSE: Specifically, the customer claimed we failed to properly wash his windows after we ground out all the mortar joints on his chimney and that, after coating his entire chimney with muriatic acid (at his demand), we caused some of the leaves on an immediately-adjacent hydrangea bush to have some brown spots. He also alleges we showed up late, and would only work for short periods of time (according to him, one half hour, to one hour at a time). Addressing this last point first, the customer and his wife work outside their home, and were absent for more than 90% of our work time, and for this reason literally have no way to comment accurately on our work hours, one way or the other. The very first day of the project was a full day of work: we purchased materials (mortar, grout bags, mortar dye) and staged them at the residence, along with all of our considerable equipment (grinders, extensions chords, buckets, strikers, mixers, etc.). We then took down four sections of scaffolding from the prior job site, loading half of it onto our vehicle, delivering it to the residence, then returning for the remainder. We then built three stories of scaffolding up, and also set aside time to complete paperwork and sign the contract. We worked a full solid day. This project was scheduled in January, 2013, a notoriously wet winter. Noting that either active rainfall or temperatures under 40 degrees forces us to instantly stop all mortar work, our notes confirm 42 separate weather-related work stoppages during the project, from large (full day rain), to micro-showers lasting only a few minutes. We spent a lot of time in our vehicle catching up on paperwork and reading a book waiting out the rain. Many of those days reached freezing temperatures during the evening, making any mortar work impossible. Despite all these weather delays, big and small, we still completed the project within the time we projected. DEMANDS FOR ADDITOINAL WORK UNDER THREAT OF NEGATIVE REVIEW: Relying in his dirty window, the customer insisted we additionally do, completely for free, a cosmetic restoration of the chimney as well as apply a Siloxane® water seal, or he threatened to leave a “very bad” Angie's List review. Despite performing all that work in exchange for his explicit promise to not write a negative review, he immediately posted a bad review anyway. This additional free work he demanded is worth more than $1,250 in labor and material expense, so he unjustly enriched himself by that amount with his reneged promise. Regarding the cosmetic restoration work, before customer purchased his house his chimney had been repaired with a tuck-point that left white mortar smears. This was not a structural issue for the chimney, but affected its appearance, which customers said they long considered an eyesore. Such work requires muriatic acid to resolve, and is technically and physically difficult: a mason has to wear a protective “bunny” suit, specialized goggles, a ventilator and specialized rubber gloves. It takes roughly two to four minutes per brick, which adds up quickly over the course of an entire chimney, since all mortar protrusions have to be chiseled away individually, and each brick must be individually sprayed with muriatic acid solution, scrubbed vigorously with a stiff-bristled brush, then hosed off, repeating as necessary. We verbally quoted $800 to adjust for the extra 8 hours of labor. The customer declined, and asked us to formally bid for the tuck-point and cap installation only. The review deliberately creates the false impression we had not done any clean-up, yet one can see our mortar and debris bags in the foreground of his uploaded picture, proving we were still mid-clean-up. The customer submitted a picture that shows the prior masons' white mortar smears; fortunately, it happens to be exceptionally easy to differentiate our work from that of the prior mason: that person used mortar with absolutely no dye in it, so it dried white, contrasting starkly with the red brick. Whereas we replaced all the mortar joints with mortar dyed black. Below we attach a picture of what the chimney actually looked like after we finished our clean-up. Addressing the second free item that the customer demanded, chimney companies routinely apply the chemical Siloxane® to seal a chimney and protect it from water damage. It is an expensive chemical and hazardous to apply, requiring specialized protective equipment and about two hours of labor. The average cost to seal a chimney this size is $250. It is also extremely sensitive to both low temperature, and high moisture, so as a practical matter we cannot have any rain on the day prior to application, the day of application, nor for 24 hours after. Nor can we have temperatures hovering near freezing. Yet the customer repeatedly insisted we do it on contraindicated days, which would instantly void the warranty. Any weather delay on this free water seal generated intense anger. Indeed, the greatest impediment to reaching any compromise was his significant anger control issues, and his willingness to use profanity. (We saved an audio file of one such extremely ugly voice mail message the customer left, frothing with anger, and containing a long string of juvenile expletives commonly known as the “S” and “F” words. We will provide a link only upon specific request, as it is not suitable to post directly in a public forum). ACID BURNS ON SOME HYDRANGEA LEAVES: The customer posted pictures of leaves from an adjacent hydrangea plant that had some large brown spots. We warned him ahead of time this would likely happen when we performed the acid cleaning he demanded despite the fact we would take basic precautions to minimize damage to plants--like using 4-mil plastic covering, as well as hosing plants with water at the end of every work day. This is so because droplets of the acid solution will form little pools, which in turn get into little fissures in the plastic covering despite best efforts. Some of the acid is suspended in air as it is sprayed in a fine mist, as well. Considering the muriatic acid we use is strong enough to remove dried mortar, it will certainly brown a leaf upon contact. For this reason we never, ever, under any circumstances guarantee the life of any plant located immediately next to a chimney we are repairing (let alone temporary cosmetic damage to a few leaves on a plant as hardy and easy to grow as a hydrangea). PROJECT CLEAN-UP: Underneath the scaffolding we placed tarping to capture the mortar extrusions, which we removed daily, followed by a thorough hosing. On the final day of mortar work and day that followed, we took down the scaffolding, all accumulated debris, removed all mortar bags and equipment, and hosed off the roof, siding, windows, chimney, and nearby grounds and vegetation. We then got on our hands and knees searching for any dime-sized or larger mortar pebbles that escaped the tarping. Finally, we hosed off the neighbor's property. We returned the next day to hose both properties one more time. Even assuming we had: (1) left a window dirty, (2) browned some leaves, and (3) preposterously accomplished a huge project in one week by working ½ hour increments, then considering the customer received a free Siloxane® water seal, free flashing to protect his roof, as well as a free and extremely labor-intensive cosmetic acid cleaning of his chimney (all of which total more than $1,250 in labor and materials, and none of which was included in the contract), the very best one could say is that he lacks a sense of proportionality. But it is far more accurate to say that a vindictive need to cause us harm, not just express an opinion (confirmed by posting deliberately misleading information and pictures), ensured this customer was completely unable write a review in good faith, and it should be disregarded.