About us
Full Service Asbestos / Mold Remediation & Removal Schedule A Free Estimate Today! Zilco LLC is a full service asbestos and mold removal company with over twenty years of experience serving the Pacific Northwest. There's a link between good health and indoor air quality. That's why it's important to ensure toxins from mold and other contaminants don't invade your property. Older homes that haven't been inspected in awhile are particularly vulnerable to fungus, and because of their humidity, kitchens, basements, and bathrooms can be veritable petri dishes of toxicity. To ensure a safe environment, you'll want to call in professional mold remediation specialists to perform a thorough mold inspection. Your mold remediation technician will take the necessary steps to remove mold and discard any materials, such as drywall, from which mold can't be completely removed.
Business highlights
Services we offer
Environmental & Ecological Consultants, Mold Remediation
Accepted Payment Methods
- CreditCard
Number of Stars | Image of Distribution | Number of Ratings |
---|---|---|
91% | ||
0% | ||
0% | ||
9% | ||
0% |
company and were told we had a significant mold problem. We needed it removed
asap and got a recommendation from this inspection company of another company with
whom they had worked often, a company in their opinion that did a good job in mold
remediation. This company is Zilco in Portland, OR
The owner of Zilco, Rick Zillmer, came out, saw our
mold situation, sat with us and explained the process as we asked our questions.
We told him from the onset that we would be wanting a re-inspect from the first
company upon the completion of Zilco’s work.
When we asked for a ‘ballpark’ estimate, he replied he
thought it would be ‘in the $2000 range’. I responded with (probably) raised
eyebrows and a soft, ‘Wow,’ to which he replied, ‘Well it will be a full two
days’ work’ (his quote).’ We were seeing this as at least a two-man crew job
since Mr Zillmer used phrases such as ‘we’ and ‘they’ when describing the work
to be done. He sent an email verification of the estimate, stating the amount
to be $2180. Yes, a large sum of money for us, but the work as he described it to us
(several labor intensive steps involved) and his assertion of the time involved for the
re-mediation appeared to warrant the amount and we assumed this estimate included any follow-up
called for by the re-inspection.
We don’t question the quality of Zilco’s work for us. In fact, the re-inspection by the first company
assessing whether all mold had been taken care of gave a thumbs up to the Zilco team.
This first company took photos of the completed space, showed us photos of the work and commented
that all areas had been remediated well.
All this aside, though, we were left with a very bad taste about the end cost of the project
and the following explains why.
Three persons, not two, arrived to do the work, the lead man mentioning this twice to us.
To us this implied it may be finished before a full two days. However, after just 3-1/2 hours this crew leader told me they were finished with the entire job.
Doing the math on this, with our original belief it would be a two-man crew over ‘two full
days’, we arrived, in our minds, of a proposed total of 32 man hours of work (8 hrs x 2 days x 2 workers).
What actually transpired, however, with a three-man crew, was a total of 10-1/2 man hours (3.5 hours x 3 workers).
To us, this total of man hours actually accrued was roughly only one-third the man hours upon which
Mr. Zillmer based his estimate, since he’d stated it would ‘be a full two days’ work.’ Even if we ‘throw in’
a few hours to account for ‘extra’ time Mr Zillmer felt could be his due for the re-inspect, this total
still falls short of his time estimate by more than half. However, we maintain we do not see the re-inspect time/man hours
as ‘extra’ since Mr Zillmer knew of our intention for a re-inspect before he gave his estimate.
I called Mr Zillmer when the crew left to talk with him about how we were seeing this: that
his estimate was overstated based on the actual time it took to complete the
job, even with the three-person crew. I included, ‘I think $2,000 for 3-1/2
hours work is very high,’ assuming his logic would show him this, too. His response: we needed to consider the travel
time, the wear and tear on the negative vacuum machine, and the expense of filters for it. I thought this was a
bogus response while I mentally noted that all of these things had already been
worked into his original estimate. This is how estimators estimate, isn’t it? I
kept silent after he defended his estimate at which point he then went on to
say that, not knowing if the re-inspect would show more work needing to be
done, he’d wait until the next day when the re-inspect was finished and he’d be
willing at that time to talk with me about a lesser cost. I thanked him for his
willingness to look at this issue the next day.
The re-inspect happened the next day, with the crew having shown up a half-hour earlier
to set up the neg vac. The inspection happened and the remediation was given a clean
bill of health. At this point, the crew leader stepped inside to say he’d just spoken
with the owner and that a check for $2180 could be written. I hesitated and then asked if the
owner had indicated anything to him about a reduced amount. He said not but suggested
I may call the owner.
I was put off by a couple of things in this situation: I felt it was quite poor customer
relations in that Rick Zillmer had his crew leader ask for the full amount of the estimate when just the
previous day he had indicated he’d be willing to reduce the estimate if the re-inspect showed no additional
work was needed. He was putting the onus on me to bring this up with him instead of the other way around.
The owner of Zilco should have called me after hearing the work was completed
and initiated a reduced amount.
Instead, I had to do all the work in the conversation that ensued. Upon answering his phone, he offered
nothing except a ‘Yes?’ after I identified myself. I needed to remind him of all that we’d both talked about the
previous day. At the end of this he paused for a few seconds, at which point he said, ‘Well, I can see that I can
reduce it to an even $2,000.’ I replied, ‘I was hoping for a few hundred dollars’ reduction,
seeing as the work itself was done in one-third the time you’d stated.’ He stood by his reduction to $2000.
I could not ever recommend anyone use Zilco for any remediation work. I have the impression
that Mr. Zillmer assessed the situation thusly: ‘They know the total. They agreed to the total.
They have the total amount. I will get that total amount.’
After receiving his quote (and one other), I hired a mold consultant (The Mold Reporters) to help me sort through the very different options. I forwarded the report from The Mold Reporters to Rick to see if it impacted his quote; he told me it did not.
Once I decided I was going to use Zilco, I emailed them a pdf of the signed contract, and set up the appointment via email. Rick worked with me via email to verify the best time to schedule a verification visit by The Mold Reporters.
Garth and Mike showed up at 8 am on the scheduled day. They got to work right away, and finished the first phase of the remediation at 12:30. My verification appointment with The Mold Reporters was at 2:00, so Garth and Mike left, and returned at 2:00 in order to be present when The Mold Reporters did their walk through. They left after the walk-through (everything looked good), and returned the next morning at 8 am to finish the work (to apply sealant/paint to the areas they scrubbed/cleaned). They were done and out of my house by 9:45 or so.
The Mold Reporters told me that the job looked good, that the containment was done very nicely.
In addition to the mold work, the crew helped rearrange some of my insulation to make it more even, and took a look at another potential issue in my house. They also wiped down surfaces (e.g., on top of my door trim) in my house with a mold killing agent.
I would hire this company again. Their price was excellent, their work ethic excellent, and per the mold consultant, the work they performed resolved my mold issue.
Licensing
State Contractor License Requirements
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our Find Licensing Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.