Dear (Member name removed), We have read your review and we appreciate your feedback. On behalf of the ICC team, we are sorry that you have had this experience, and I can assure you that we are committed to the highest levels of customer service and quality work. As President of ICC, I take any feedback about our services, both positive and negative, seriously. At ICC, we document each and every step of the restoration process through our online jobs management system, so we can ensure that only the proper and necessary steps were taken to ensure your property was restored to pre-loss condition. We also utilize our job management system to ensure that we have communicated to everyone involved and this provides us with an accurate record of the loss as a whole, including a communication log. I have reviewed the documentation in your job file and I would like to address the issues that you mention in your review, so we may work towards finding a resolution to this situation. I’ve outlined each of your overarching statements so I can address each of them properly, using the facts of the case at hand. “Kept coming back to correct poor workmanship; never got it completed to our satisfaction” While nailing in the toe kick in your bathroom the nail did cause a crack. We immediately came out and repaired it. At this time, we also took care of a couple of paint touchups, a caulking issue and a new quarter round. We have reviewed these errors with the applicable team members involved, and we have provided additional training to them along with any disciplinary action necessary, as we hold our team members and work to the highest standards possible. Part of being a business with integrity is owning up to any errors on our part, and we take responsibility for them, but we also are a company that does everything possible to remedy a situation in which our services or work are not to the customer’s satisfaction. I think you’ll find this evident by the fact we came out multiple times to your home to do minor repairs over a five month period, per your request, and at the end of each trip, we were told that those repairs were the “final” punch list items and the job was now complete. Yet, after completing each item/trip, there was yet another unrelated item to be repaired after the fact. Over five months, it is difficult to ascertain whether or not the damage was caused by work performed by ICC or unfortunately, by you or some other party. But, as a company that is dedicated to ensuring customer satisfaction, we continued to come out and perform the minor repairs without question regardless who caused the damage. As part of ensuring that our customers are satisfied with our work, we present each customer with a “Certificate of Satisfaction” document. This document is reviewed and signed by the homeowner which is their written approval that the work was completed and to their satisfaction. After we completed the additional minor repairs fore mentioned, not only did we get a verbal “ok” that the work was completed to your satisfaction, we also presented you with a “Certificate of Satisfaction” twice. You signed the document both times, which was your written approval that the work was performed to your satisfaction and complete. Since there were extra punch list items that “popped up” after the initial Certificate was signed, we went an extra step and called several times to ensure you were happy with the job, even after you signed the second COS. “Grossly Overcharged, Could Not Explain Incoherent Invoices” Firstly, ICC does not begin any work unless an agreed upon scope of work is put into place. We also use Xactimate, an insurance industry-accepted pricing software for our estimates, which is substantially less than typical remodeling costs. In your review, you mention that you took the line items and did a personal calculation of the total cost of the work performed, and that there was a “huge discrepancy” between your numbers and the ICC invoice. During a documented discussion with you and ICC on 3/31/13, we reviewed your personal estimation of the work done. ICC discovered several errors in your calculations for assumed credits of line items owed to you that ICC actually paid for, and thus, was charging back to you on the ICC invoice. In addition to the credits, we also saw that you had included profit, but not overhead into your final totals (please note, overhead and profit are typical of any restoration contractor’s invoice). There was another discrepancy between your calculations and the ICC invoice due to extra trips for the minor repair items and you had also not calculated any time for the Project Manager’s hours on the job as a whole. We provided clear billing and paperwork whenever requested, and also had multiple conversations to clarify any questions and concerns you had. Upon reviewing your file, I see that there are over ten instances documented where we discussed and clarified any questions you had about billing, sometimes reviewing the same questions on several different occasions. The insurance company actually provided you all the funding for this project, and our invoice was actually less than what your insurance coverage provided you in way of reimbursements. “Not Open to Discussing with Us, Instead they Rudely Sent Us to a Collection Agency” Again, after reviewing your file, I see that we communicated over 24 times through email and phone calls in efforts to secure payments that were due to ICC for work completed and when it was requested, to explain any questions on billing you might have had on invoices that were due. We also sent snail mail letters that asked for payment to be made and indicating that payment was past due. As you can see, we made multiple attempts to secure payment before we had to resort to sending you to a collection agency. But, again, ICC wants to ensure customer satisfaction so we made every effort in our communications to reach out to you to correct the situation (which many other contractors would not do after such a time lapse), but we had no response from you. Because of that lack of response for several months, it appeared that you did not have these concerns anymore, and you would not respond to us, so as a business we had to take the final action of sending your account to collections, as we have been attempting to get payment for the balance due for a total of six months. As with any business you receive services from, that business needs to get paid for their work. If we are unable to get that payment from you for work that was provided (and was signed off on via the COS), we then need to go to the next step of collecting what is owed to us. “Never Finished the Job” After the second Certificate of Satisfaction was signed on 12/7/12, you brought up another issue of a trim board and a flushing issue two weeks later. For three months after this issue was brought to our attention, we attempted numerous times to setup an inspection appointment so we could remedy the situation. After three months of trying to reach you, and also requesting final payment for work rendered, you finally stated that you would not finish paying your amount due until we resolved the issues at hand. We again tried to setup an inspection, but had no response from you. Thus, it is difficult to finish a job when you cannot set an appointment to get into the home to inspect and do the work necessary to finish the job. After all of our attempts to connect with you, we actually provided you a credit of $250.00 on the final bill as a goodwill gesture towards the two issues. I think this was generous considering we have never been allowed to come inspect these specific issues or to even see if they indeed exist. “Didn’t Honor the Year’s Warranty” In regards to the honoring of our 5 (not 1) year warranty, it clearly states in our paperwork provided to you that we do not honor the 5 year warranty on our work unless the job is paid in full. Regardless of the non-payment issue on your end, we still made all minor repairs that you brought to our attention despite the fact your account was not paid in full during that time period. “This is Not a Reputable Company” On that note, I would like to invite readers of this review to please visit the following pages in regards to our reputation: ICC Customer Reviews: http://www.icchelps.com/testimonials.php As Featured in the US Builders Magazine Article: “ICC Restoration and Cleaning Services-Insurance Restoration Specialists that Truly Care” http://www.icchelps.com/blog/icc-restoration-cleaning-featured-in-us-builders-review-magazine/ As Featured in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Business Journal as “Best Places to Work in 2012” (and in 2007 and 2009): http://www.icchelps.com/blog/icc-best-place-to-work/ On our company’s homepage, you’ll also notice several icons of our numerous affiliations including the Better Business Bureau, the Restoration Industry Association and the Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification. By clicking on any of the icons, you will be able to know more about the rigorous protocols and ethical guidelines that ICC adheres to in order to be part of these prestigious organizations. (Member name removed), my team is always here to speak with you so we may resolve this matter. I would like for you to contact me directly at 651-888-2406 or tom@icchelps.com to discuss this in greater detail. Thank you, Tom Laska, President ICC Restoration & Cleaning Services