
THE BUILDING INSPECTOR OF AMERICA
About us
Prime Property Inspectors – The Building Inspector of America is a full-service home inspection and environmental testing company. Our certified home inspectors are professionals in engineering, architecture or construction and are current with emerging issues facing the home inspection industry. Our attention to detail is reflected in our comprehensive digital home inspection reports. Environmental services include evaluation and testing for radon gas, mold, volatile organic compounds, allergens, odors, electromagnetic fields and combustion by-products.
Business highlights
Services we offer
& Electrical Systems; New Construction Inspections – Four Phases: Foundation, Air Sampling, Final, Home Inspection Services – Comprehensive evaluation of the Structural, Indoor Air Quality Evaluations, Infrared Thermography, Mechanical, Mold Assessments, Plumbing, Pre-Drywall, Septic System Surveys., Water Quality Tests, and One Year Warranty Inspections; Commercial Inspections; Problem Diagnostics; Wet Basements & Foundation Cracks; Environmental Services – Radon Testing
Accepted Payment Methods
- CreditCard
Number of Stars | Image of Distribution | Number of Ratings |
---|---|---|
93% | ||
2% | ||
3% | ||
0% | ||
1% |
I hestitated to write a review for Mr. Kapoor until I had a chance to get done some of the work that he suggested we needed done in order to improve the musty smell from our house. I wanted to see if his recommendations would eliminate the musty smell, and decrease the indoor humidity. I'm still in the process of getting quotes for some of the work, so I can't speak on whether some of his recommendations were spot-on for remedying our problem or not.
I'll explain what I liked and disliked about this moisture inspection:
LIKES
1. Mr. Kapoor arrived on time and didn't seem rushed, despite me asking numerous questions and possibly making him late for his next appointment.
2. He pointed out things that SHOULD have been pointed out by my original home inspector 8 months prior when we bought the house, but apparently some of these things were missed during that original inspection.
3. He sent the report earlier than promised (about 3 days versus one week, which he previously mentioned).
4. He allowed me to call him after the inspection, when I was getting quotes, to bounce back some of the contractors' comments and thoughts, so that I could get further clarification, to make sure I am on the right track.
5. He actually called me a couple weeks AFTER the inspection, out of the blue, to see how things were going with getting the issues addressed. At this time, I was able to provide to him some additional feedback after getting more quotes, and could, again, bounce things off of him.
DISLIKES:
1. I still walked away from the report unclear about what the next steps should be if we do all the repairs and there is no change in the musty smell. And I am unclear of the extent of the current possible MOLD problem in our house. It wasn't his recommendation to do mold testing at that time; the most important was to do the inspection and see what we're working with. But Mr. Kapoor's comment about him "knowing there would be high mold counts" if he were to test left me feeling awful about exposing my 2 children to a potentially unsafe home. I guess the only way to know that is through mold testing, which I'm sure he would be happy to do for me if requested. I guess I just still feel like I don't know the extend of the mold problem in our house and just how well these repair recommendations will affect the air quality.
2. IMr. Kapoor didn't use any moisture inspection tools. It was only after the inspection that I kept researching "moisture inspections" and found that some inspections use techology such as infra-red thermal techonology to detect moisture or leaks in wall and ceiling cavities, but there weren't any inspection tools used. It leaves me wondering if the inspection could have been more thorough, or if something was missed and could be contributing to the musty smell in our house.
3. Mr. Kapoor said the grading around my house was very poor, but several contractors/landscapers I called in for quotes said that, overall, our grading is FINE (with the exception of a couple areas that could use improvement). I asked Mr. Kapoor to rate the grading around the house, out of "10" and he gave it an overall, "1" which signified that it was pretty awful. But I even had a landscaper leave without giving me a quote, telling me that it wouldn't be right of him to charge me for grading that he sees no problem with. This was a common response from other regrading quotes, as well, which makes me wonder why there is such contrast between Mr. Kapoor's assessment and the professional landscapers' assessments. It leaves me with more QUESTIONS than ANSWERS, and I am even more perplexed about the value of certain repairs to alleviate the musty smell in our house.
OVERALL, I would use Mr. Kapoor again for a home inspection in the future if we were to buy another house. His customer service is excellent, and he's very friendly and appears knowledgeable. But again, it left me with more questions about other possible sources of water intrusion that may he may not have been able to see, and I wonder how valuable moisture inspection tools could have been. I didn't even know to ask. And I also don't know why there was such a disparity between his opinions about my grading versus the opinions of the professional graders. And also, the caveat is that I haven't yet gotten any of his recommendations done yet, so I can't say whether those things will ultimately make a difference in the musty, high humidity values in our house. I would be more than happy to report back once these repairs are performed.
He seemed to have a keen eye, and was quite thorough - caught a number of electrical issues, and had appropriate equipment (drill to access sump pump crawl space, ladder to access difficult attic space) on hand to do what needed to be done.
Felt price was fair, if average. Had to re-schedule a few times due to issues with seller, and Bldg Inspectors of America folks were great - totally on the ball and responsive.
"This report is riddled with inaccuracies and false statements and it is our intent to respond to these claims. The following are the facts of the case gleaned from the inspector notes, phone conversation logs and detailed inspection report submitted to the client: 1. The services were rendered almost 2 ½ years ago on July 24, 2008 and not on July 15, 2009 as posted on the website on January 27, 2011. 2. We were initially contacted by the Member through the Maryland Home Performance website. The contractors on the website are trained and certified in accordance with the technical standards of the Building Performance Institute, BPI. The BPI technical standards for Certified Building Analyst do not include infrared scans when performing an energy audit. In our initial phone conversation with the client we clearly explained the fee of $595 and the process that we would follow. 3. On Thursday, July 24, 2008 the inspector arrived promptly at 9.00 am, the appointed time. Save for a 15 minute lunch break on the premises, the inspector worked diligently for the next 6 ½ hours up until 3:30 pm; the inspection took longer than the customary 3 hours due to difficult access to two attics, basement areas, and crawl space. Clutter, excessive storage and the client's inability to provide utility bills for review in a timely manner also added to the time spent on the premises. On completion of the inspection, the client expressed satisfaction and thanked the inspector for his professionalism in doing a thorough job. 4. In accordance with the BPI protocols, we conducted a thorough interior and exterior inspection to determine building characteristics, identify bulk moisture issues, and gross structural issues. In addition, heating and cooling equipment and appliance information was noted and the building air flow standard was calculated in preparation for a blower door test. In view of the large openings and air leakage sites observed during the inspection, the blower door test could not be performed. This was clearly discussed with the client on-site and also documented in the detailed 18-page “Home Performance Evaluation” report that was electronically transmitted to the client a few days later. 5. Almost two years later, our office received a phone call on April 20, 2010 from the Member demanding that we return to her house and perform a blower door test and an infrared scan. The inspector followed up with a phone conversation with the client and explained that he would gladly return for a blower door test at no charge, and that an infrared scan was clearly outside the scope of the original fee of $595 that was paid. The inspector felt that he was being fair since he had expended so much time on-site and in report preparation two years earlier. The inspector proposed that if this was not agreeable, he would offer a partial refund of $300. There was no discussion whatsoever about the Better Business Bureau. 6. On May 4, 2010 we scheduled a revisit to the property for a blower door test. The client cancelled the appointment and instead opted for the partial refund of $300. On May 5, 2010, a check for $300 was mailed to the client. The Member incorrectly states that she was refunded $200 on the Angie’s List website. Over the past 23 years our company has established a fine reputation in the Washington, DC area based on fair dealings with our clients. We strive to maintain happy and satisfied customers and feel that a great injustice has been done by an inaccurate and false portrayal of the services performed."
Licensing
State Contractor License Requirements
All statements concerning insurance, licenses, and bonds are informational only, and are self-reported. Since insurance, licenses and bonds can expire and can be cancelled, homeowners should always check such information for themselves. To find more licensing information for your state, visit our Find Licensing Requirements page.
*Contact business to see additional licenses.