DAIGNAULT REALTY INC

I purchased a foreclosure in Cocoa FL in April of 2012 using Daignault Realty (DR). In the transaction, DR acted on behalf of both the buyer (myself) and the seller (bank). I was appointed a buyer's agent, Shane Sorenson, who was not legally representing the seller, but was from the same agency as the seller's agent. During the time leading up to closing, I verbally, made my agent aware of the fact I would not be traveling to FL from CT to see the house myself and would be relying on both his information and the information of a home inspection company in order to make my decision. After the deal went through when I was able to travel to see the house, I discovered something I was not made aware by my agent. There was a dog kennel owed by the neighbor on the property line. The kennel extends two feet above the 6 foot fence and is in plain view complete with 4 barking dogs. This material fact was never disclosed by my agent. Now I am stuck with a dog nuissance problem I don't deserve. By Florida law, from what I have learned (i am not a lawyer), an agent representing the buyer, is required to disclose all material facts. From this point forward, this matter will be pursued legally. I have made Daignault Realty aware of this situation and so far they have yet to reply. I would not recommend them to anyone in the market for real estate.

,Back in April of 2012, I bought a foreclosed single family unit in Cocoa, FL. Since I was living 1200 miles away, I elected to buy it "sight unseen"-big mistake. My agent Shane Sorenson of Daignault Realty in Merritt Island, Florida, who was acting as a buyers agent in the deal failed to disclose, what I believe to be, a material fact in the transaction. Although he emailed photos of both the inside and outside of the property, he neglected to disclose either verbally, in writing or in photographs, a large dog kennel belonging to the next door neigbor. The kennel is 8 foot tall, has 4 barking dogs, and is positioned right on the property line. This non-disclosure has resulted in a very poor quality of life for me from the time I moved in up until now. I never would have bought the house had I been made aware of such a probable nuissance. In my opinion, this agent was either negligent or acted with intent to deceive. In either case, I was not represented properly. This is now become a legal matter and I will have to wait to see the outcome. For the reasons given, I would never recommend doing business with either Shane Sorenson or Daignault Realty.

I