We contracted with Direct Build Inc to perform a major remodel on our home. Architect plans were provided for the job. Bottom Line: we would not do business with them again nor would we recommend them to anyone. Our experience working with them included severe communication issues, lack of responsiveness, tens of thousands of cost overruns, unfinished contractual tasks and overall poor quality/value When we interviewed Lori for this job, she indicated that the job would take approximately 60 days to complete. Once we told Lori that we had selected Direct Build for the job, she came out for a “walk through”, where we compared her bid with the plans to make sure we were all on the same page for the work to be done. She emailed us her contract, along with a cost for each line item. When we returned the signed copy via email, we added a few line items discussed during the walk through (dog door, replace some bi-fold doors – see comments below). Problems with the job began when there was some conflicting guidance between what was on the plans and what the Regional Building Department (RBD) required. Lori was unwilling to contact the architect to get it resolved and no progress was made until we stepped in to 1) find out who Lori was talking to at RBD and 2) call the architect to come up with a resolution. The permit was issued and work began on the remodel. There were some additional issues with the plans, and although there was a statement clearly on the plans to contact the architect for any issues, they refused to do so. Approximately 30 days into the job, I asked Lori for a schedule/timeline. This request was done via email….no response was provided. Despite repeated email and verbal requests for a schedule/timeline, I was unable to get any information until she was there to get a check. At that time, I was provided information about what order things would be installed. I asked Shane for a timeline; his response was that he would ask Lori to provide that information. I was unable to get any specific information regarding the duration until the final 30 days of the job. So, although the initial time estimate provided to us was 60 days, the job actually took 120 days (from when the contract was signed in September 2017). I began asking about the status of items we (thought) had been added to the contract (doggie door, replace a window in the basement). Each request (and there were at least four requests over a 30 day timespan) was met with no response until I was told these items were “not part of the contract”. Naturally, we were confused as they were working on other things we had added. These items were discussed and agreed to during the “walk through” and they were part of the original contract we signed. We provided the doggie door, and when asked when it would be installed got an answer of “we did not add it to the contract but will do it for free”. Nice offer, but it was supposed to be part of the contract. Our request for the status of replacing the window in the basement was met by stonewalling (haven’t done it yet…..don’t know the kind of window it is (this was resolved by me looking at the sticker on the window and telling them what kind of window it was)…..can’t find anyone to install it…..it’s not part of the contract, I don’t know how to install a window (yes that was said to us by the General Contractor)). When she sent the initial funds request, there was a “this is what I am asking for” amount and a “this is what I really need” amount. I asked for some details regarding what the amount requested covered. Initially the requests clearly lined up with the bid she provided. Things got murkier as the job progressed. When asked for detailed information, I was repeatedly told “We don’t provide that information”. An example is a charge for trim work that we had added to the contract. We had a discussion where Lori provided several line items and their cost (bookshelves, window casings). When I received a request for funds, the line item was for Interior Trim material. I called and asked for details regarding whether this charge was for bookshelves or window casings and was given the response “we don’t provide that level of detail”. I would like to state here that we always paid in a timely manner and never shorted them funds. After a miscommunication of the cost of a line item (charge on request for funds was $500 more than what we were verbally told it would be), I had to insist that all communication be in writing. They advertise “Price +” as their charging policy. DO NOT get this confused with Cost Plus! The commonly accepted definition of Cost Plus is an open book process where bills from the contractor should include documentation of all hard costs. This would include invoices for materials and subcontractors, as well as work hours and billing rates for direct labor supplied by the contractor. This is a trust-but-verify process to ensure that the contractor is keeping good records and billing responsibly. This is NOT their practice. During the initial interview, Lori stated that the prices would be what Direct Build was charged by the Subs and that it would be transparent. We thought this meant we would actually see the Sub’s bills so we would have insight into all charges. When we asked for some copies of invoices, we were again told “We don’t provide that information”. We had no insight into pricing and were unable to make any decisions about cost trade-offs. After many emails about whether we would indeed be complete by the end date provided on the schedule I finally received, the end date arrived. I asked whether we would get any documentation regarding the completion of the job (things that were part of the contract like window casings had not been completed), I was told “no, we don’t do that. It’s just a verbal between us. But we do provide a warranty on our work”. I asked several times for some warranty details, and was finally told we had to submit any issues at 30 days and 6 months. We submitted several items for the 30 day warranty. After 10 days from our initial submittal, we sent texts to Shane for status and then an email to Lori to find out a status. We got no response from either of them until we threatened legal action. We did not hear from any of the subcontractors until a MONTH after our 30 day submittal. If we had not followed up with Shane and Lori, we would still be waiting. The communication for this job was poor. The quality of work was marginal at best. There was no apparent oversight or quality control of work as many items were done so poorly that it questions their oversight of their subs and the quality of work. We expected the general contractor to review the work of the subs both during and after their portion of the job was completed. Although they claimed they were there each day to review work that was done, there were several instances where we had to take care of an issue so work would continue. We found a note from the drywall contractor that identified areas that needed additional work before they could continue. We had to clear the area out and let Direct Build know about the note and that we had done the work so the timeline that I didn’t have any insight into would not be affected. There were many days that Direct Build did not come to the house to look over work done by Subs. As a result, we ended up having to install six additional lights in the kitchen as they obviously did not QC the electrical work. This was done by us at our expense. The electrical work (Precision Electric) came in over double the amount of the bid. Since we did not see the work statement from the Sub – we don’t know where the issue really lies. Initial findings for the warranty included not properly caulking both showers (although Shane made them redo the shower floor, but somehow the sloppy caulking throughout the other parts of the shower got missed), the shower drain was epoxied into place with a bunch of plastic still attached, the paint job was so poor that every room had to be re-done or touched up. There was no lighting in h